We use cookies to improve your experience on our site.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more information on how we use cookies, view our privacy policy.
If you gave yourself an extrovert rating of 7 or higher…
Notice I did not ask if you are or are not an extrovert. Extroversion and introversion are not binary traits. There are degrees or levels and different flavors of each. As with so many labels today, there is danger in using these terms indiscriminately. It’s more helpful to think of these concepts as continuums.
And these continuums are more insightful when we break down introversion and extroversion into the two categories (or flavors) below:
So we have two flavors of extrovert:
It is likely that you’re more of one than the other. Or neither could apply to you. By the way, introverts can also come in both people and task flavors.
The adjacent continuum graph shows an example of leader, Jane Sample. Based on Jane’s talent survey, she classifies as an extrovert in her approach to tasks. How so?
Her chart also categories her as a people orientated extrovert. How?
Based on the graph, it’s fair to categorize Jane as an extrovert with both tasks and people. But that one-word categorization doesn’t tell us some important nuances about her approach. For example:

Jane generally perceives herself as being as a pioneering, assertive, competitive. confident, positive winner.
However Jane’s more people orientated and task orientated introverted co-workers likely have much different perspectives and perceptions.
Are we talking about the same person? How are such diverse perceptions possible?
While Jane’s assertive, fast paced style works well with those wired like her, people with more introverted styles, from both a task and people perspective, can find her difficult to work with as the perceptions above reveal. Productivity and collaboration can suffer when stress misunderstanding prevails. How do these perceptions effect Jane’s ability to lead?
I have two recommendations for helping Jane to lead more effectively: awareness and empathy. She needs to understand how and where her approach is not playing with her audience of co-workers. And understand the emotions that her approach can be stirring up in her followers. Armed with those insights, she can more effectively read the room and adapt her approach as situations dictate.
Jane would benefit from:
These are merely quick tips offered here as a sampling of a example profile. This is a surface level treatment of a detailed topic. Your scenario will certainly be different than Jane’s. There’s value in taking a more personal, deeper dive that happens with coaching. It paves the path for self discovery, self awareness and self-regulation. And for your ongoing leadership development.
The new continuum graph used in the case study is new innovation by our assessment partner, TTI Success Insights. They have turned DISC on its side for added insight into workplace behaviors. The continuum approach helps to avoid unproductive discussion about highs and lows with the four DISC categories.
Are you curious about what your Behavior Continuum looks like? If you take the Working From Home survey, your free report will be emailed to you directly. This report was the first to use the horizontal DISC graph. And it’s still complimentary.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more information on how we use cookies, view our privacy policy.