Tom Lemanski's

Your Bridge to Discovery

Leadership Breakthroughs icon

Seven Scenarios for Team Conflict

Conflict

Shouldn't We All "Just Get Along"?

Have you ever looked at your work team and wondered:  “Why can’t we all just get along?”  Perhaps a better question is: Why should we just get along? By “just” getting along, could we be compromising our objectives for the sake of artificial harmony?

Is Getting Along Over Rated?

In his book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, one of Patrick Lencioni’s five dysfunctions is Fear of Conflict.  He contends that fear of conflict can actually create more conflict as unaddressed issues get bottled up and personal resentment grows.  The pursuit of artificial harmony prevents candid discussion of critical issues. If getting along becomes more important than tackling tough topics, you’re setting the team up for failure.

If artificial harmony is counterproductive, do we instead want team members to be fighting like cats and dogs?  Let’s remember that cats and dogs can exist peacefully and amicably once they develop both tolerance and respect.  So if these different species can figure it out, why can’t we?

Dog & Cat

Developing Tolerance and Respect

As humans, we too can be as different as cats and dogs in our approach to solving problems, communicating and generally working with others.  The prerequisite for functional team cohesiveness is a common commitment to mutually beneficial goal or outcome.  Without that, why would you have a team?

Seven Scenarios for Team Conflict

Like cats and dogs, diverse team members are wired differently. They can and should provide diverse perspectives. Diverse perspectives are invaluable for quality, balanced decisions.  But when we try to get these perspectives to mesh, flying sparks are inevitable. For better or worse, here are seven ways that team members will potentially conflict.

  1. Desire for Preservation vs. Drive for Growth
  2. Pursuit of Safety vs. Risk
  3. Quality vs. Productivity
  4. Optimism vs. Realism
  5. Need for Structure vs. The Inclination for Pioneering
  6. Predictable vs. Dynamic Styles
  7. Aggressive vs. Reflective Decision Making
 
Conflict

For each of these potential areas of conflict, the inability to respect and value the opposite end of the spectrum.  Effective, balanced team decision making is a balancing act.  While a leader’s objective should never be 100% agreement, the team’s diverse factions need to be heard and evaluated.

Agree to Disagree

Pursuit of harmony through full consensus driven leadership is not the answer.  A team leader’s responsibility is to make informed, transparent decisions that serve the goals of the team, not their egos. To alter Abe Lincoln’s quote about fooling people: A leader can not please all of the people all of the time and is foolish to try.

Footnote

The aforementioned Abraham Lincoln quote is: 

“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”