To gain critical mass, aligning the 3 P’s needs to achieve “must have” status as opposed to a “nice to have”. Decision makers/leaders first need their WHY (successful examples or case studies) then “the how” (proven methodologies).Significant obstacles prevent a positive prediction for “when” this alignment can occur. Pardon my pessimism. Here’s part of what’s getting in the way.Aligning people, profits and planet will require epiphanies for a lot of unenlightened leaders who struggle connecting just the first two P’s. Southwest Airlines has successfully connected people and profit. But in a copy-cat world, their competition has failed to replicate either their intangible value system or their tangible profits. Would adding a third “P” make it easier or more challenging? What is the common perception?By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more information on how we use cookies, view our privacy policy.
One Response
Since posting this article, I have discovered two rays of hope for the Triple P movement.
I read “Onward” the story of Starbucks turnaround. CEO Howard Schultz has provided a benchmark that other leaders can aspire to.
I recently learned that the newest generation of job seekers is actively asking about a company’s sustainability plan as they consider which positions they consider.